|
Our Signal Integrity, Power Integrity, EMC Philosophy.
...Symptoms of Signal Integrity Power Integrity and EMC failure.
Symptoms of SI, PI & EMC design failures include flaky
boards, hardware software wars, poor manufacturing yield,
high warranty return rate, FCC & CISPR regulatory failure,
extra pre-production board design turns, established
products suddenly becoming hard to manufacture, excessive
EMI shielding, and generally unexplainable strangeness.
Designing with poor SI EMC hygiene is like leaving food
on the kitchen counter in south Florida. A seemingly
infinite number of roaches will converge on your kitchen.
The purpose of our training is to teach methods of design
that will keep the electronic roaches out of your product.

War Story..
A major telecommunications manufacturer documented
their experience in trying to solve this problem. When
they began measuring their process, they found that
94% of the time they needed to redesign the PCB in order
to solve high speed problems. After implementing a new
process with appropriate tools, they reduced the redesign
to less than 1%. They also maintained that rate over
a base of 1300+ PCB designs. At the end of the study,
they had so few rework problems that it became standard
practice to convene a formal process review any time
a board failed. FCC certification became routine. Design
cycles and product shipments became far more predictable.
Redesign and rework costs were poured into new product
development. The benefits to the organization were massive.

Foundation is Board Stack Up
& Power Delivery.
The foundation of proper SI EMC design is the
board stack up and power delivery system. The board
in combination with the bypass capacitor array provides
the current for the drivers and also provides the path
for the return current. Digital designers often think
only in terms of signal current since that is the path
displayed on the schematic. Return current is the other
half of the circuit. If you can not point at you design
and determine precisely where the return current is
flowing, you are in trouble. Nothing else will be predictable.
Remember, the return current has the same rise time
at the signal current, therefore this analysis must
be correct over a fairly wide frequency range.

Triage Signals
Triage your signals into clocks, high speed
busses, and status signals. Clocks must always be analyzed
for proper distribution, delay, clearance, and termination.
They are the single greatest source of SI EMC problems.
Next look at the high speed busses. They do not have
as high of a repetition rate as clocks, but they generally
switch synchronously with fast edge rates. These signals
must be analyzed like the clock signal, but in addition
you must consider the fact that the synchronous nature
of the switching will cause significant ground bounce
if the power deliver system is not adequate. Status
signals are low repetition rate signals that will generally
not cause any problems as long as they are not effected
by cross talk from a clock or high speed buss. Create
a budget for ringing, cross talk, and ground bounce
that will guarantee that your signal settling requirements
will be met even if those vectors add up in phase. The
nature of flaky boards is that they work 99.999% of
the time. The 0.001% failure only comes up 1000 times
per second at modern clock speeds. Design the clock
distribution, termination, etc to make sure it works.
Do the same for the high speed busses.

Implement a Signal Integrity Power Integrity & EMC Design
Process
The design process we teach will result in layout,
termination, and topology rules that are adequate to
ensure success for both signal integrity as well as
radiated emissions. In other words, it ensures a solid
design with adequate noise and timing margins so the
product works reliably. It will have a high manufacturing
yield, low warranty return rate, and it will pass FCC
/ CISPR radiated emissions tests on the first try. Remember,
if you fail radiated emissions, you can not ship an
otherwise properly working product. If you can not ship
the product, you do not get paid and life gets ugly.
Regardless of the method you implement,
it will never work unless you close the loop. If you
have any unexpected results with SI, PI, or EMC, you must
find the source of the error and correct your process.

Perspectives on Radiated Emissions
There are two basic ways of controlling radiated emissions.
You can either suppress it at the source or you can
attempt to contain it. The difficulty with containing
it is that it can get very expensive and it can be quite
unpredictable. If you suppress noise at its source,
you do not need to chase it. Suppressing noise at the
source is the classy way to go. The same types of things
one does to suppress radiated emissions at its source
are in most cases, identical to the things one would
do to attain good signal integrity performance. The
methods used will save money in board turns. It will
also make the entire process more predictable. It will
always leave you with the option to add shielding and
filtering if necessary.
Generally, it is far easier to get a board
to work reliably than it is to get the board to be quiet.
The only way to succeed on a regular basis is to solve
noise problems at their source.
|
|
|